🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Momentum

In Europe, a increasing group of nations are exploring parallel bans.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that phones and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". A law could be passed next year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to protect children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an similar ban is "a potential measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged the legislature to pass a bill increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a comparable action, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised parents to restrict their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has approved a non-binding statement calling for a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is given. Even though it highlights of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the resolution does not create binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a useful first step," said the MEP driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by strong data".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the government vowed to further research the matter.

Charities have raised warnings. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a girl who was lost after being exposed to dangerous social media material contends that a strict age ban may not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are safe and age appropriate for children," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, legislation is mostly occurring at the state level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill barring those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a law limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra access needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed laws requiring parental consent for teenagers to open social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from some politicians to mimic this example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Global Outlook

Apart from the West, other states are similarly considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international agencies strike a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "might prove counterproductive". The agency notes that social networks can be a "lifeline" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve safety.

As this global debate evolves, the steps of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that states globally are less and less prepared to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.